The Male Advantage: A step by step blueprint for achieving Outlier Male status

Product Information

I gotta thank Kris from 1STMAN for introducing me to the concept of The Male Advantage → How every man can drastically increase his sexual market value through years of self-improvement. This task was based on Shepard’s mental rotation task ( Shepard and Metzler, 1971). For each trial, one three-dimensional image was presented on the upper part of the screen, and two others on the lower part. Participants were asked to choose one from the bottom to match with the top; the matching image could be identified only by mental rotation. Participants were asked to press the “Q” key if he/she chose the image on the left, or the “P” key he/she chose the image on the right. The formal test included 180 trials and was limited to 3 min. The rotation angles of the images were 15°, 30°, …, 345°, with a step of 15°. Each trial would remain on the screen until participants responded by pressing “P” or “Q”. Raven’s progressive matrices The analysis showed no differences between older and younger children for all tasks [ b = –1.13, t(330) = –0.54, p = 0.586 for symbolic approximate arithmetic; b = 0.57, t(168) = 0.60, p = 0.551 for mental rotation; b = –0.94, t(222) = –1.21, p = 0.227 for word semantic processing; b = 1.17, t(249) = 0.47, p = 0.638 for spatial working memory; b = 0.95, t(216) = 1.51, p = 0.133 for Raven’s Progressive Matrices]. In the multilevel model (when classroom effect was considered), no region differences were found for all tasks [ b = –5.49, t(18) = –1.61, p = 0.125 for symbolic approximate arithmetic; b = 0.96, t(16) = 0.81, p = 0.429 for mental rotation; b = –1.42, t(21) = –1.41, p = 0.172 for word semantic processing; b = –4.73, t(20) = –1.38, p = 0.181 for spatial working memory; b = 1.10, t(15) = 1.25, p = 0.229 for Raven’s Progressive Matrices]. None of the interactions involving gender and approximate arithmetic were significant [ b = 0.12, t(477) = 0.03, p = 0.979 for gender × region; b = 5.26, t(479) = 1.06, p = 0.288 for gender × age; b = –5.37, t(476) = –0.079, p = 0.431 for gender × region × age]. Siegel, L. S., and Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Dev. Psychol. 24, 28–37. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.28 How men become better with age, and how more men need to work towards that peak rather than ruining everything young and letting their best years become their worst.

the Male Advantage in Frontiers | Spatial Ability Explains the Male Advantage in

Males outperformed females in approximate arithmetic and mental rotation, whereas females outperformed males in word semantic processing. There was no gender difference in spatial working memory and Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Science students were superior to arts students in approximate arithmetic, b = 2.43, t(551) = 2.55, p = 0.011. No difference across majors was found for other tasks: Raven’s Progressive Matrices, b = 0.52, t(6.48) = 0.59, p = 0.577; spatial working memory, b = 2.40, t(4.51) = 1.21, p = 0.286; word semantic processing, b = –0.86, t(6.36) = –0.63, p = 0.550. The interaction between gender and major was not significant [ b = –0.70, t(550) = –0.37, p = 0.715].Examination of the combined effect size was performed by computing a null model where the test of significance for the intercept is examined (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Results of this analysis revealed a mean estimated d of 0.155 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.087-0.223), indicating that males significantly outperformed females on visual-spatial working memory tasks, t(97) = 4.54, p< 0.001. Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., et al. (2000). An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task. Brain Lang. 74, 157–170. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2325

[PDF] The Male Advantage: A step by step blueprint for

Aureli F, Fraser ON, Schaffner CM, Schino G. The regulation of social relationships. In: Mitani JC, Call J, Kappeler P, Palombit R, Silk JB, editors. Evolution of Primate Societies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2012. pp. 531–551. Oksuzyan A, Crimmins E, Saito Y, O'Rand A, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. Cross-national comparison of sex differences in health and mortality in Denmark, Japan and the US. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2010; 25:471–480. [ PMC free article : PMC2903692] [ PubMed : 20495953]The variance component in the full sample was examined to determine whether significant variation in effect sizes exist between samples. Results of this analysis showed that it was the case, χ 2(97) = 391.34, p< 0.001. This indicates that significant heterogeneity exists in the effect sizes. Strictly speaking, it appears that the overall estimate of effect size did not provide a representative summary of the sample of effect sizes. The examination of potential moderators might therefore shed light on factors accounting for this variability. Moderators of sex differences in the overall sample Harris T, Cook EF, Garrison R, Higgins M, Kannel W, Goldman L. Body mass index and mortality among nonsmoking older

The Male Advantage - Archive.org

Many studies have shown that males outperform females on spatial ability tasks, especially the mental rotation tasks ( Voyer et al., 1995). Gender difference in spatial ability emerges as early as about 3–5 months of age ( Moore and Johnson, 2008; Quinn and Liben, 2008) and is evident to the age of 95 years ( De Frias et al., 2006; Tran and Formann, 2008). Moreover, based on data from more than 200,000 subjects from 53 nations, Lippa et al. (2010) showed that males performed better than females on visuospatial tasks. Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., and Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125, 2012–2022. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf211paleodemographic analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1989; 80:49–58. [ PubMed : 2801905] L e v e l ⁢ 1 ⁢ : S c o r e i j = β 0 j + β 1 j ( A g e i j ) + β 2 j ( G e n d e r i j ) + β 3 j ( C o ⁢ var i a t e s i j ) + γ i j