This table shows the options (remember that neither the 5 or the 6 should be sent to less than 1, because the smallest total possible should be 2). In this moral minefield, the different substantive theories of justice do at least agree on Aristotle’s ‘formal principle’ of justice or fairness, which says: ‘Equals should be treated equally and unequals should be treated unequally in proportion to the relevant inequalities.

She would also greatly influence Garfield's writing, giving him suggestions for his writing, including the original idea for Smith. Jackson, Lillipolly, and Growler are some of my favorite characters in any literature and I've read lots and lots of books.This is another of Garfield’s rare excursions into writing a children’s book definitely written for children. Prof Gillon, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Imperial College London and retired GP, believes that today’s pressures demand a more deliberate, committed focus on fairness. That way they'll know what is expected of them (and hopefully at least) they'll be less rows over what's fair and what isn't. CTER, when operational, will have a duty to promote equality of opportunity for under-represented groups. Fairness should be a fundamental value in how patients and staff are treated, but in a struggling and under-staffed NHS, it often takes a back seat.

What is particularly enjoyable about this book is the descriptive language that Garfield uses, and the cliffhangers where you are left wondering what will happen next. Boliver proposes that the ‘meritocratic equality of opportunity model’ should be supplanted by a ‘meritocratic equity of opportunity model’ which prioritises distributive over procedural fairness. There are many beautiful illustrations by Margaret Chamberlain which help to draw the reader in; for example, the use of greys and whites during the large blizzard scene actually help you to share the same cold, miserable experiences with Jackson and to feel for him. As a consultant obstetrician in a deprived area of North Wales, he’s in regular contact with health inequalities: they present at his antenatal clinics every week.These poems are full of desires and ambitions – some fulfilled, some thwarted, from learning to read to reaching the moon, from shape-shifting to living without mirrors. Fair’s Fair continues to fulfil Adrian Mitchell’s description of Susan Utting’s work: “Her poems are musical, magical and have a clarity which goes straight to the heart”. But this can be a bit misleading if it leads us to see the outcomes which need to be equalised as access to material goods, income or attainment regardless of merit.

The protagonists of the story are very inspiring and will prove to be the role models for young children.Whilst there may be inconsistency between cases as to the exact test applied, what is clear is that the Court is motivated to ensure that any sanctioned Plan is not only capable of successful implementation, but that it reflects a rational deal vis-à-vis all relevant stakeholders whilst simultaneously recognising that not everyone can, or will, receive ideally what they would like. In contrast, it appears that in other cases such as Re Nasmyth Group Ltd and Re The Great Annual Savings Co Ltd, the Court has taken less of a strict reactive approach.

As a Victorian boy living on the streets we meet Jackson outside Paddy’s Goose in the worst part of town, which is fitting for this main character. Our defending just isn't good enough, to be fair', 'if we want to escape relegation, we're going to have to give it 110%, to be fair'. Prof Banfield’s definition of fairness is closely related to equality and treating people as individuals. This might come in handy if there are extras which you'd like them to do - perhaps an extra task would mean bonus points earned!Prof Gillon stresses, as Aristotle did, that medical ethics is not an exact science: dilemmas often don’t have simple answers. Elegiac and sensuous, pressing and haunting in their almost hallucinatory narrative detail, the poems in Fair’s Fair reveal Susan Utting’s capacity to move us at its most powerful yet – a new collection of great skill and lucid tenderness. This, it was felt, would facilitate social mobility by recognising individual achievement and merit rather than inherited privilege. But it has spread into the wider culture and I wonder if we do culturally have a problem now with face-to-face contact. Some of the principles which have guided the Court’s analysis of fairness, and the exercise of its broader discretion over sanction, were recently (and conveniently) listed in Re Prezzo Investco Ltd [2023] EWHC 1679 (Ch) at [68].